Sovereign Cloud

Leave US cloud. Run on European cloud.

Trump made the dependency hard to ignore. European teams now have to plan around US political chaos alongside cloud architecture. The first move may be a tested exit plan before any migration. Cloudnovi moves workloads from US-owned hyperscalers onto European-owned providers when the risk justifies it.

Control checklist

Questions customers ask

01
Ownership Who owns the provider, and which government can lean on it
02
European operations Primary storage, backups, logs, and metrics
03
Data custody Which laws can reach customer data, backups, logs, and support access
04
Exit plan How fast can you leave if the provider becomes a risk
Working definition

A practical sovereign setup uses European-owned providers for the services that matter, keeps operations in Europe, and gives your team a rehearsed exit path.

Why now

Trump turned cloud dependence into customer risk.

European teams still care about compliance. Customers ask the sharper question now: do your critical systems depend on a country that can change its mind overnight?

US political volatility

A US-owned cloud stack now carries Washington risk. Trump's second term has made tariffs, executive orders, public threats, and sudden policy swings part of infrastructure planning. European ownership gives customers a clearer answer.

European control

Procurement teams are tired of explaining why critical systems depend on companies that ultimately answer to another government. European-owned providers keep the control chain closer to the customers, courts, and regulators you answer to.

Exit plan pressure

A migration may be premature. A tested exit plan is harder to postpone. Customers want to know how fast you can move data, rebuild services, and keep support running if US-owned infrastructure becomes a risk.

Risk assessment

Calculate your sovereign-cloud exposure.

Answer a few questions about provider ownership, CLOUD Act exposure, customer pressure, data control, managed services, and exit readiness. The result separates urgent migration pressure from exit-plan work.

Current score
0 /100

Low exposure

Your current answers point to limited sovereignty pressure. Keep ownership, data paths, and exit steps documented before customers ask.

Which providers run production or customer-facing workloads today?

Select every provider that matters for the workload you are assessing. The calculator caps provider score so multi-cloud setups do not dominate the result.

What are customers or procurement asking you today?

Choose the strongest signal you have seen in sales, security review, procurement, or renewal conversations.

What type of data or customer workload is in scope?

Answer for the workload you would least want to defend on a US-owned platform.

How well can you prove where control planes, logs, support, and backups go?

EU region selection alone is not the full answer if support access, telemetry, backups, or managed control planes cross other jurisdictions.

How tied is the workload to provider-native managed services?

The more your architecture depends on proprietary platform services, the harder a fast move becomes.

If you had to leave this provider, what is already tested?

This means evidence from a rehearsal, restore, failover, migration test, or runbook exercise, not only a slide or backlog item.

Send the assessment

We receive the score, the answers, and your context. Fields marked with * are required.

Current score 0/100
Low exposure

By submitting you agree to our privacy policy. We never share your details.